|
Page 1
of 2 (Page
2,
References)
by Dr.
Tim O'Shea (www.thedoctorwithin.com)
We are the most
conditioned, programmed beings the world has
ever known. Not only are our thoughts and
attitudes continually being shaped and
molded; our very awareness of the whole
design seems like it is being subtly and
inexorably erased.
The doors of our
perception are carefully and precisely
regulated. Who cares, right?
It is an exhausting
and endless task to keep explaining to
people how most issues of conventional
wisdom are scientifically implanted in the
public consciousness by a thousand media
clips per day. In an effort to save time, I
would like to provide just a little
background on the handling of information in
this country.
Once the basic
principles are illustrated about how our
current system of media control arose
historically, the reader might be more apt
to question any given story in today's news.
If everybody believes something, it's
probably wrong.
We call that Conventional Wisdom.
In America,
conventional wisdom that has mass acceptance
is usually contrived: somebody paid for it.
Examples:
- Pharmaceuticals
restore health
- Vaccination brings
immunity
- The cure for cancer
is just around the corner
- When a child is
sick, he needs immediate antibiotics
- When a child has a
fever he needs Tylenol
- Hospitals are safe
and clean.
- America has the
best health care in the world.
- And many many more
This is a list of
illusions, that have cost billions and
billions to conjure up. Did you ever wonder
why you never see the President speaking
publicly unless he is reading? Or why most
people in this country think generally the
same about most of the above issues?
How This Set-Up Got Started
In Trust Us We're
Experts, Stauber and Rampton pull together
some compelling data describing the science
of creating public opinion in America.
They trace modern
public influence back to the early part of
the last century, highlighting the work of
guys like Edward L. Bernays, the Father of
Spin. From his own amazing chronicle
Propaganda, we learn how Edward L. Bernays
took the ideas of his famous uncle Sigmund
Freud himself, and applied them to the
emerging science of mass persuasion.
The only difference
was that instead of using these principles
to uncover hidden themes in the human
unconscious, the way Freudian psychology
does, Bernays used these same ideas to mask
agendas and to create illusions that deceive
and misrepresent, for marketing purposes.
The Father Of Spin
Bernays dominated the
PR industry until the 1940s, and was
a significant
force for another 40 years after
that. (Tye) During all that time, Bernays
took on hundreds of diverse assignments to
create a
public perception about some idea or product.
A few examples:
As a neophyte with the
Committee on Public Information, one of
Bernays' first assignments was to help sell
the First World War to the American public
with the idea to "Make the World Safe for
Democracy." (Ewen)
A few years later,
Bernays set up a stunt to popularize the
notion of women smoking cigarettes. In
organizing the 1929 Easter Parade in New
York City, Bernays showed himself as
a force to be
reckoned with.
He organized the
Torches of Liberty Brigade in which
suffragettes marched in the parade smoking
cigarettes as a mark of women's liberation.
Such publicity followed from that one event
that from then on women have felt secure
about destroying their own lungs in public,
the same way that men have always done.
Bernays popularized
the idea of bacon for breakfast.
Not one to turn down a
challenge, he set up the advertising format
along with the AMA that lasted for nearly 50
years proving that cigarettes are beneficial
to health. Just look at ads in issues of
Life or Time from the 40s and 50s.
Smoke And Mirrors
Bernay's job was to
reframe an
issue; to create a desired image
that would put a particular product or
concept in a desirable light. Bernays
described the public as a 'herd that needed
to be led.' And this herdlike thinking makes
people "susceptible to leadership."
Bernays never deviated
from his fundamental axiom to "control the
masses without their knowing it." The best
PR happens with the people unaware that they
are being manipulated.
Stauber describes
Bernays' rationale like this:
"the scientific
manipulation of public opinion was
necessary to overcome chaos and conflict
in a democratic society." Trust Us p 42
These early mass
persuaders postured themselves as performing
a moral service for humanity in general -
democracy was too good for people; they
needed to be
told what to think, because they
were incapable of rational thought by
themselves. Here's a paragraph from Bernays'
Propaganda:
"Those who manipulate
the unseen mechanism of society constitute
an invisible government which is the true
ruling power of our country. We are
governed, our minds molded, our tastes
formed, our ideas suggested largely by men
we have never heard of.
This is a logical
result of the way in which our democratic
society is organized. Vast numbers of human
beings must cooperate in this manner if they
are to live together as a smoothly
functioning society.
In almost every act of
our lives whether in the sphere of politics
or business in our social conduct or our
ethical thinking, we are dominated by the
relatively small number of persons who
understand the mental processes and social
patterns of the masses. It is they who pull
the wires that control the public mind."
Here Comes The Money
Once the possibilities
of applying Freudian psychology to mass
media were glimpsed, Bernays soon had more
corporate clients than he could handle.
Global corporations fell all over themselves
courting the new Image Makers. There were
dozens of goods and services and ideas to be
sold to a
susceptible public. Over the
years, these players have had the money to
make their images happen. A few examples:
| Philip
Morris |
Pfizer |
Union
Carbide |
| Allstate |
Monsanto |
Eli
Lilly |
| tobacco
industry |
Ciba
Geigy |
lead
industry |
| Coors |
DuPont |
Chlorox |
| Shell
Oil |
Standard
Oil |
Procter
& Gamble |
| Boeing |
General
Motors |
Dow
Chemical |
| General
Mills |
Goodyear |
|
The Players
Though world-famous within the PR industry,
the companies have names we don't know, and
for good reason.
The best PR
goes unnoticed.
For decades they have
created the opinions that most of us were
raised with, on virtually any issue which
has the remotest commercial value,
including:
|
pharmaceutical drugs |
vaccines |
|
medicine as
a profession |
alternative
medicine |
|
fluoridation
of city water |
chlorine |
|
household
cleaning products |
tobacco |
|
dioxin |
global
warming |
|
leaded
gasoline |
cancer
research and treatment |
|
pollution of
the oceans |
forests and
lumber |
|
images of
celebrities, including damage control |
crisis and
disaster management |
|
genetically
modified foods |
aspartame |
|
food
additives; processed foods |
dental
amalgams |
Lesson #1
Bernays learned early
on that the most effective way to create
credibility for a product or an image was by
"independent
third-party" endorsement.
For example, if
General Motors were to come out and say that
global warming is a hoax thought up by some
liberal tree-huggers, people would suspect
GM's motives, since GM's fortune is made by
selling automobiles.
If however some
independent research institute with a very
credible sounding name like the Global
Climate Coalition comes out with a
scientific report that says global warming
is really a fiction, people begin to get
confused and to have doubts about the
original issue.
So that's exactly what
Bernays did. With a policy inspired by
genius, he set up "more institutes and
foundations than Rockefeller and Carnegie
combined." (Stauber p 45)
Quietly financed by
the industries whose products were being
evaluated, these "independent" research
agencies would churn out "scientific"
studies and press materials that could
create any
image their handlers wanted. Such
front groups are given high-sounding names
like:
|
Temperature Research Foundation |
Manhattan Institute |
|
International Food Information Council |
Center
for Produce Quality |
| Consumer
Alert |
Tobacco
Institute Research Council |
| The
Advancement of Sound Science Coalition |
Cato
Institute |
| Air
Hygiene Foundation |
American Council on Science and Health |
|
Industrial Health Federation |
Global
Climate Coalition |
|
International Food Information Council |
Alliance
for Better Foods |
Sound pretty legit
don't they?
Canned News Releases
As Stauber explains,
these organizations and hundreds of others
like them are front groups whose sole
mission is to advance the image of the
global corporations who fund them, like
those listed on page 2 above.
This is accomplished
in part by an endless stream of 'press
releases' announcing "breakthrough" research
to every radio station and newspaper in the
country. (Robbins) Many of these canned
reports read like straight news, and indeed
are purposely molded in the news format.
This saves journalists
the trouble of researching the subjects on
their own, especially on topics about which
they know very little. Entire sections of
the release or in the case of video news
releases, the whole thing can be just lifted
intact, with no editing, given the byline of
the reporter or newspaper or TV station -
and voilį! Instant news - copy and paste.
Written by corporate PR firms.
Does this really
happen? Every single day, since the 1920s
when the idea of the News Release was first
invented by Ivy Lee. (Stauber, p 22)
Sometimes as many as half the stories
appearing in an issue of the Wall St.
Journal are based solely on such PR press
releases.. (22)
These types of stories
are mixed
right in with legitimately researched
stories. Unless you have done the
research yourself, you won't be able to tell
the difference.
The Language Of Spin
As 1920s spin pioneers
like Ivy Lee and Edward Bernays gained more
experience, they began to formulate
rules and
guidelines for creating public opinion.
They learned quickly that mob psychology
must focus on emotion, not facts. Since the
mob is incapable of rational thought,
motivation must be based not on logic but on
presentation. Here are some of the axioms of
the new science of PR:
- technology is a
religion unto itself
- if people are
incapable of rational thought, real
democracy is dangerous
- important decisions
should be left to experts
- when reframing
issues, stay away from substance; create
images
- never state a
clearly demonstrable lie
Words are very
carefully chosen for their emotional impact.
Here's an example. A front group called the
International Food Information Council
handles the public's natural aversion to
genetically modified foods.
Trigger words
are repeated all through the text. Now in
the case of GM foods, the public is
instinctively afraid of these experimental
new creations which have suddenly popped up
on our grocery shelves which are said to
have DNA alterations. The IFIC wants to
reassure the public of the safety of GM
foods, so it avoids words like:
|
Frankenfoods |
Hitler |
biotech |
| chemical |
DNA |
experiments |
|
manipulate |
money |
safety |
|
scientists |
radiation |
roulette |
|
gene-splicing |
gene gun |
random |
Instead, good PR for
GM foods contains words like:
| hybrids |
natural
order |
beauty |
| choice |
bounty |
cross-breeding |
|
diversity |
earth |
farmer |
| organic |
wholesome |
|
It's basic
Freudian/Tony Robbins
word
association. The fact that GM
foods are not hybrids that have been
subjected to the slow and careful scientific
methods of real crossbreeding doesn't really
matter. This is pseudoscience, not science.
Form is everything and substance just a
passing myth. (Trevanian)
Who do you think funds
the International Food Information Council?
Take a wild guess. Right - Monsanto, DuPont,
Frito-Lay, Coca Cola, Nutrasweet - those in
a position to make fortunes from GM foods. (Stauber
p 20)
Characteristics Of Good Propaganda
As the science of mass
control evolved, PR firms developed further
guidelines for effective copy. Here are some
of the gems:
- dehumanize the
attacked party by labeling and name
calling
- speak in glittering
generalities using emotionally positive
words
- when covering
something up, don't use plain English;
stall for time; distract
- get endorsements
from celebrities, churches, sports
figures, street people - anyone who has no
expertise in the subject at hand
- the 'plain folks'
ruse: us billionaires are just like you
- when minimizing
outrage, don't say anything memorable,
point out the benefits of what just
happened, and avoid moral issues
Keep this list. Start
watching for these techniques. Not hard to
find - look at today's paper or tonight's TV
news. See what they're doing; these guys are
good!
PAGE 2 |